By end of day on Wednesday, submit: Final revised version of Part 1: Argument to your Opposing Audience

By end of day on Wednesday, submit:

Final revised version of Part 1: Argument to your Opposing Audience
Final revised version of Part 2: Argument to your Like-Minded Audience
Self-Analysis Contrast Essay.
To Submit:

Download all your work from Google Docs into a PDF.
Note: only PDFs will be accepted.
When you click START ASSIGNMENT, choose Browse My Computer
Attach ALL THREE documents by clicking ADD ANOTHER FILE
Only submit when all 3 parts are attached as PDFs.
Please try NOT to submit a second or third attempt. It overwrites e9xisting submitted work and then I can’t find them.
Rubric
Module 2 Grading

Module 2 Grading

Criteria    Ratings    Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting/DesignGenre Appropriate, real world formatting
Appealing to the eye for medium of publication (print, digital, etc)
Hyperlinks/use of evidence is smooth and effective for genre

20 to >19.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations

Goes above and beyond.

19 to >16.0 pts
Strong

Good choices.

16 to >15.0 pts
Effective

Mostly meets the assignment goals but may be weak or underdeveloped.

15 to >13.0 pts
Developing

Attempts to meet assignment goals but has a variety of weaknesses or problems in execution.

13 to >0 pts
No Marks

Totally missing or clearly misunderstanding the assignment.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 1: Writing to the OppositionDirectly Address opposition’s view. Critique their position. Make your own claim, creating a rebuttal or refutation. End with goodwill. Use evidence effectively.

40 to >36.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations

Goes above and beyond .

36 to >34.0 pts
Strong

Meets assignment goals effectively, though possibly without finesse, style, or insights.

34 to >30.0 pts
Effective

Mostly meets the assignment goals but may be weak or underdeveloped.

30 to >28.0 pts
Developing

Attempts to meet assignment goals but has a variety of weaknesses or problems in execution

28 to >0 pts
No Marks

Totally missing or clearly misunderstanding the assignment.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 2: Writing to the Like-Minded AudienceBuild a relationship with Your audience. Give reasons for further action. Give clear next steps/goals for moving forward. Effectively use evidence to inspire.

40 to >36.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations

Goes above and beyond .

36 to >34.0 pts
Strong

Meets assignment goals effectively, though possibly without finesse, style, or insights.

34 to >30.0 pts
Effective

Mostly meets the assignment goals but may be weak or underdeveloped.

30 to >28.0 pts
Developing

Attempts to meet assignment goals but has a variety of weaknesses or problems in execution

28 to >0 pts
No Marks

Totally missing or clearly misunderstanding the assignment.

40 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 3: Self-AnalysisIdentify and explain each audience group (do more than identify them. Explain their values, biases, and expectations). Analyze WHY you had to make different choices based on your knowledge of the target audiences
Contrast how your knowledge/awareness of the DIFFERENCES in target audiences’ identity, values, biases, and expectations to explain WHY the techniques had to be different.
Analyze HOW the techniques affected each audience differently, but still supported your overall position on the topic.

80 to >72.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations

Goes above and beyond .

72 to >68.0 pts
Strong

Meets assignment goals effectively, though possibly without finesse, style, or insights.

68 to >60.0 pts
Effective

Mostly meets the assignment goals but may be weak or underdeveloped.

60 to >56.0 pts
Developing

Attempts to meet assignment goals but has a variety of weaknesses or problems in execution

56 to >0 pts
No Marks

Totally missing or clearly misunderstanding the assignment.

80 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity and Analytical LanguageClearly edited for grammar, verb tenses, sentence structure, spelling, and other proofreading skills. Language is clear and easy to read and appropriate for the context/community.

20 to >19.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations

Style and flair.

19 to >16.0 pts
Strong

Clear and concise.

16 to >15.0 pts
Effective

Mostly clear but a few consistent problems.

15 to >13.0 pts
Developing

Lots of grammar/editing errors showing widespread weaknesses in proofreading.

13 to >0 pts
No Marks

Not in English.

20 pts

Total Points: 200

 

By end of day on Wednesday, submit: Final revised version of Part 1: Argument to your Opposing Audience

We offer the best custom writing paper services. We have answered this question before and we can also do it for you.

GET STARTED TODAY AND GET A 20% DISCOUNT coupon code DISC20

We offer the bestcustom writing paper services. We have done this question before, we can also do it for you.

Why Choose Us

  • 100% non-plagiarized Papers
  • 24/7 /365 Service Available
  • Affordable Prices
  • Any Paper, Urgency, and Subject
  • Will complete your papers in 6 hours
  • On-time Delivery
  • Money-back and Privacy guarantees
  • Unlimited Amendments upon request
  • Satisfaction guarantee

How it Works

  • Click on the “Place Order” tab at the top menu or “Order Now” icon at the bottom and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
  • Fill in your paper’s requirements in the "PAPER DETAILS" section.
  • Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
  • Click “CREATE ACCOUNT & SIGN IN” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
  • From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.